FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:"The Toa"
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
== "Myths" ==
 
== "Myths" ==
Hi. If you can't rephrase your myths articles such that it is encyclopedic, your articles will be deleted for being irrelevant and nonsensical. You should not present fiction as fact in a wiki.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 23:49, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
+
Hi. If you can't rephrase your myths articles such that it is encyclopedic, your articles will be deleted for being irrelevant and nonsensical. You should not present fiction as fact in a wiki. And please at least provide a link to the mods you are describing in the article. How can your statements be considered truthful if there are no references to back them up?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 23:49, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:52, March 21, 2011

hxjxfhethrtfjktgkjghdik

I, and many others, have had enough of your irrelevant and unencyclopedic "myth" pages. I have added a delete template to all of them and they shall be quickly deleted. If you create any more of these rubbish myth pages without coming to a consensus, you may be blocked from editing. I anyway suggest you don't edit at all until you learn some proper English grammar. GTASanAndreas12345 09:21, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

"Myths"

Hi. If you can't rephrase your myths articles such that it is encyclopedic, your articles will be deleted for being irrelevant and nonsensical. You should not present fiction as fact in a wiki. And please at least provide a link to the mods you are describing in the article. How can your statements be considered truthful if there are no references to back them up?--spaceeinstein 23:49, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.