GTA Wiki

Help required: categories

Hi everyone, please help us by filling out this form!


We are determining how players best define and/or differentiate the terms "game modes", "missions" and "activities". This will be used to help us develop a clear and logical category tree to house articles related to this type of content.


Thank you in advance for help!

READ MORE

GTA Wiki
GTA Wiki
19,871
pages
(Created page with "I don't know if any of you can tell but right now I am banging my head on a coffee table and shoving my copy of GTA IV in a toaster because of this. ~~~~")
 
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't know if any of you can tell but right now I am banging my head on a coffee table and shoving my copy of GTA IV in a toaster because of this. [[User:2095|2095]] 03:31, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
I don't know if any of you can tell but right now I am banging my head on a coffee table and shoving my copy of GTA IV in a toaster because of this. [[User:2095|2095]] 03:31, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
:WTF. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 03:34, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:
  +
I just don't get it, many fans were dissapointed by the lack of planes, I don't thing R* made a Game dissapointing on Purpose?
  +
  +
:How is not adding something make the game disappointing?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 16:41, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:: I agree, I personally think that not including MILITARY GRADE PLANES makes it more believable, sure TBOGT has the Buzzard, but thats abit less over powered, I mean the IV series is focused on believable acts and thought out stories, with character development, which is why such stats as Fat and muscle were left out, cause I doubt you could take Niko seriously if he was 300lbs and had a pink afro [[User:Zachariah Zuan|Zachariah Zuan]] 17:01, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::
  +
A <u>game </u>does not have to make sense you know?
  +
  +
:::I meant that the number of features alone doesn't make a good game. Simply rating a game because it doesn't have something is very naive. Half Life 1 has TONS of weapons, enemies, and stuff. Half Life 2 didn't even reach the numbers HL1 has but it's still a very solid game compared to HL1. That could be said to almost any games that have apparently "removed" features. There are other reasons for purposefully not including some stuff, including time and hardware constraints, practicality, and usefulness.
  +
  +
:::A game is still a medium of art. It's best not to include pieces of the artwork if it means ruining the entire thing completely.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 03:52, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:::: also, even though it is a game, they WANTED it to make some sense, otherwise you'd have Niko getting bitten by a radioactive spider, then fight aliens in a distance planet, they wanted a believable story and they got it [[User:Zachariah Zuan|Zachariah Zuan]] 06:41, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::: 1*Where would they put the fighter jets
  +
::: 2* The buzzard is very overpowered maybe too much like in muitplayer it sucks
  +
::: 3*You would be on the other end of the city in like 3 seconds
  +
::: 4* Where would the jet fit into the story
  +
::: 5*Its useless to fly a jet in such a tight city with skyscrapers that go higher than the hight limt it self so you would hit building after building after building
  +
::: ([[User:Zombotech Corporation|Zombotech Corporation]] ([[User talk:Zombotech Corporation|talk]]) 01:00, November 16, 2012 (UTC))

Latest revision as of 01:01, 16 November 2012

I don't know if any of you can tell but right now I am banging my head on a coffee table and shoving my copy of GTA IV in a toaster because of this. 2095 03:31, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

WTF. --Gta-mysteries Talk 03:34, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

I just don't get it, many fans were dissapointed by the lack of planes, I don't thing R* made a Game dissapointing on Purpose?

How is not adding something make the game disappointing?--spaceeinstein 16:41, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
I agree, I personally think that not including MILITARY GRADE PLANES makes it more believable, sure TBOGT has the Buzzard, but thats abit less over powered, I mean the IV series is focused on believable acts and thought out stories, with character development, which is why such stats as Fat and muscle were left out, cause I doubt you could take Niko seriously if he was 300lbs and had a pink afro Zachariah Zuan 17:01, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

A game does not have to make sense you know?

I meant that the number of features alone doesn't make a good game. Simply rating a game because it doesn't have something is very naive. Half Life 1 has TONS of weapons, enemies, and stuff. Half Life 2 didn't even reach the numbers HL1 has but it's still a very solid game compared to HL1. That could be said to almost any games that have apparently "removed" features. There are other reasons for purposefully not including some stuff, including time and hardware constraints, practicality, and usefulness.
A game is still a medium of art. It's best not to include pieces of the artwork if it means ruining the entire thing completely.--spaceeinstein 03:52, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
also, even though it is a game, they WANTED it to make some sense, otherwise you'd have Niko getting bitten by a radioactive spider, then fight aliens in a distance planet, they wanted a believable story and they got it Zachariah Zuan 06:41, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
1*Where would they put the fighter jets
2* The buzzard is very overpowered maybe too much like in muitplayer it sucks
3*You would be on the other end of the city in like 3 seconds
4* Where would the jet fit into the story
5*Its useless to fly a jet in such a tight city with skyscrapers that go higher than the hight limt it self so you would hit building after building after building
(Zombotech Corporation (talk) 01:00, November 16, 2012 (UTC))