Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.
There are currently
Please apply below if you are interested.
GTA Wiki requires an active group of users to act as Staff.
You may apply for Rollback rights or Administrator/Bureaucrat privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.
Requests for Demotion (RfD) may also be posted here. Please see Demotion Rules for instructions on how to deal with Demotion posts in the correct manner.
- 1 What are Staff roles?
- 2 How does one qualify?
- 3 Rules
- 4 Rules: Demotion
- 5 Active Requests
- 6 Inactive requests
- 7 Archives
What are Staff roles?
There are three different Staff rights. Members of these rights have different powers and are trusted to use them responsibly.
How does one qualify?
Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.
When applying for promotion, a community vote will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at bureaucrat discretion. Only bureaucrats should close votes.
Please submit your requests at the top of the "Active requests" page subsection.
Stuble - Patroller
Hi! I've joined this Wiki in 2015 and since then I made over 1700 edits. Maybe it's not much but I restrict myself to adding interwikis to the articles (I think they're important). I'm more active on GTA Wiki's Discord server where I share my knowledge about the GTA series with other users and help with research. I've played most of the GTA games (except GTA Vice City Stories) so I can easily unpick facts in articles.
Why did I decided to apply for this position? Because other users encouraged me to apply and I think the „new buttons” will help me edit/correct articles. Thanks for reading this and have a nice day. Stuble (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Kiwismurf (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Andy A. (Talk · Edits) 09:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - NalexandruN (stalk)/(mock) 10:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - BolbiiS (Talk ~ Edits) 10:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Noirlime4L (talk) 11:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - TheS424 (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Matrexpingvin (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - kamikatsu_ (Talk) 11:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - 12:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Sam Talk 12:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - User:Raziel Reaper (Talk To Me • Edits ) 12:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 08:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Probably worth mentioning you have nearly 25K edits on the Polish GTA Wiki and have been an Admin there for nearly 2 years and a Patroller (moderator) since 2015. This is one of those situations where our "experience elsewhere" qualification clearly applies. Kiwismurf (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I personally don't know many things about you, but the 27000 edits and almost 8 years of activity can't be wrong. NalexandruN (stalk)/(mock) 10:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've watched you be a great and helpful editor for a while, so easy yes for me. We could use another patroller :) BolbiiS (Talk ~ Edits) 10:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Aside from your edits quality (which frankly, speaks for itself), I also feel like your attitude and behavior are what a staff member needs, from the little I've seen either here or on the discord server. You come off as mature and professional, which are qualities that I personally consider even more important than editing. As Smurfy pointed out, you also have an extensive experience with both contributing to Wikis and specifically contributing to GTA Wiki communities, which itself is a huge plus. -- User:Raziel Reaper (Talk To Me • Edits ) 12:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I remember you from even when I was last kicking around and agree with all above. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 08:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
LS11sVaultBoy - Administrator
- Closed as successful by Smurfy:
Well, what can I say? It was 8 years ago and one week ago that I first applied for a Patroller position on the wiki. That one got denied due to a lack of edits (I think I only had about 30 at the time). Less than a week after the request was closed, on 10th January 2013 I tried again having gained over 200 genuine edits in less than 24 hours. That time I was successful. I served as a Patroller until March when I was then promoted to Admin following a large vandal attack from a user called Zombie22 which I helped stop. After serving as an Admin for over a year, it was in January 2015 (6 years ago) that I finally became a Bureaucrat, a position I held with great honour every day for over 3 years until my ultimate retirement due to finishing college and starting work.
In recent times I have bought a new PC and despite it having initial (and typically continuous) issues, my love for editing wikis of all kinds never died. I finally made my comeback a couple of weeks ago and have now been active all of this week so far.
I am a project man at heart and have already set at work fixing up some GTA 1 mission pages which were never completed and I intend to find more work like this to do. However, I am also capable of sweeping up vandalism, identifying likely vandals and informing admins like in the good old days.
As a Patroller, I can promise to be active as much as possible. I work from home for the unforeseeable future which means I have plenty of time to check on the wiki's activity to make sure nothing untoward is happening.
*UPDATE: As per Smurf's comment I have upgraded this to an Admin RfP*
Note: votes reset due to change in position applied.
- Yes - Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 21:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Matrexpingvin (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - BolbiiS (Talk ~ Edits) 21:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - NalexandruN (stalk)/(mock) 21:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - Andy A. (Talk · Edits) 22:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - AK-28 (Talk) 22:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - kamikatsu_ Talk 00:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - TheS424 (talk) 00:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes - 03:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Was going to make it an automatic No for "fixing up some GTA 1 mission pages". J/K. I had been planning in a few days to suggest you apply. I suspect this vote will have a short turnaround time. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 21:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: In theory, you could actually apply for Admin or even 'Crat, you don't actually have to start back from Patroller (see precedent and explanation here). Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 21:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- I cannot think of a better person to apply for this position. Also, good to see you. AK-28 (Talk) 22:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- All regularly active staff 5/9 have voted and vote is otherwise unanimous, so would still pass even if all remaining staff voted against, request successful (early). Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 12:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, hadn't seen this in my feed. It's academic now but FWIW my vote would have been yes too. Sam Talk 14:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
BolbiiS - Patroller
Seeing as there's currently a whopping 5 Patroller spots vacant right now, It's as good a time as any that one of those slots be filled. And thanks to the recommendation of Kiwismurf (congrats on becoming a Bureaucrat, by the way), I'm finally going to make the dive and apply.
For those that care, I'm Nick. I'm 18 going on 19 and from the good ol' US of A. My experience with the Grand Theft Auto series is lacking compared to others on staff, considering my first time playing any GTA game was GTAV only 2 years ago, and I played playing GTA IV for the first time only a week ago, but I truly love the game and the series as a whole.
I first started editing the wiki around February of last year, but have been especially active since December, and it's been nice the contribute something significant to the Internet for the past year. With this promotion, I hope to help continue to make positive contributions to the Wiki and curb negative ones with the rollback tool.
Increased recent interest in GTA Online, with both it reaching a record number of players after the Casino Heist and the current worldwide quarantine, has brought more and more visitors to the wiki. Unfortunately, that also means more vandals and new editors who may not understand the rules. Additional help in article curation for both the present and the future is important, which is why I hope that with an induction into the staff, I can assist in keeping the Wiki a great place to visit. Even while I still have many things to learn in terms of editing, I think I am ready to be a part of the staff here.
- Yes - Matrexpingvin (talk) 15:04, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - DocVinewood (talk) 15:15, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - 15:21, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - kamikatsu_ Talk 15:28, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - Andy A. (Talk · Edits) 18:30, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - S-424 (talk) 18:57, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 00:12, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - NoirlimeTalk | Contribs 10:37, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - SlashM,C 10:41, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
- Easy yes from me. You've already done some great work and I believe you'll be a fine addition to the team. Matrexpingvin (talk) 15:04, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- Same as above. You have good contributions and you'll learn fast once you get the patroller position. -- 15:21, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
- The reason I recommended you apply is I have noticed you have been monitoring and fixing other edits for a while now, a clear indication of a willingness (and readiness) to be more than just a good content contributor. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 00:12, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
Kiwismurf - Bureaucrat
Right, it's been a few months now of surviving with a solo Bureaucrat after Konan's removal and Monk's departure. While Sam is no doubt capable of handling that "load", in today's climate of global crisis, we have to be aware of the possibility of being left unexpectedly leaderless, so having a second Bureaucrat is really important. Plus, with GTAVI and GTAO2™ on the horizon, we could get busy later this year. Thankfully we have not had to deal with fallout from Gamepedia unification.
For those that don't know, the "s" in smurf is for my real name, Sean. I'm from New Zealand, and I'm old. Yes folks, my profile page doesn't lie, I really was born in '69 <insert R* sexual joke here>.
I've been Admin here since September 2017, having previously also served a period as an Admin under my retired account in 2015). If it means anything to you, my combined edit count over the 2 accounts (closing in on 30,000) makes me currently the 3rd most prolific editor on GTAWiki (excluding bots). Unlike last time, the many and various frustrations borne of community contribution in wikis in general has not resulted in resignation. Like any human, I still have some bad habits, some of which I'm trying to break, some of which I am nurturing. To make a good omelette, you have to break some eggs, and I still trust my instincts to know which eggs to break.
As the primary resident rules enforcer (a role I don't mind - as above, I'm not here to be any egg's friend), I have some "leadership" ideas on policy direction to improve our ranking within Fandom and particularly the handling of older content that no longer fits with the current (and probable future) policy that I plan to propose/implement this year. Don't worry, I'm not talking about any major shift in content focus (still no mods/fanon etc), just the way we present the content with an aim to increase page impressions and reduce repetitive (often conflicting) content.
I'll certainly continue to encourage all users to be unafraid to challenge leadership decisions following my own example of willingness to openly object to errors made by previously serving bureaucrats.
Also, despite my distaste for the Fandom mobile skin and the Fandom App, given they are now the majority of our content consumers (if not our editors yet), we have to accept that our content mostly looks terrible on those devices because we have focused on the full experience (I'm certainly guilty of building content that I know just won't work on mobile). Work needs to be done on that, hopefully not at the expense of our "full experience" though.
- YES SlashM,C 11:37, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes Matrexpingvin (talk) 11:40, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - DocVinewood (talk) 12:42, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - User:Raziel Reaper (Talk To Me • Edits ) 12:50, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - S-424 (talk) 13:11, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - kamikatsu_ Talk 13:22, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - BolbiiS (Talk 14:25 April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - 14:34, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - Sam Talk 18:29, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes - Andy A. (Talk · Edits) 18:35, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Easy yes from me. Been waiting for this day for a while. SlashM,C 11:37, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- No doubt about this. Nobody is more suited for the position than you. DocVinewood (talk) 12:42, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
- No objections from me AT ALL. When Monk left we lost a very experienced 'crat and in you we'll be gaining another. Sam Talk 18:29, April 6, 2020 (UTC)