Forum:Wouldn't Capitol City make a good GTA 5

--Roman bellic 02:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I think Capitol City is a good place for GTA 5. Who agrees with me? - Peter13

Washington DC I presume? If so, you are correct. And why stop at just D.C? Why not do Maryland (in particular Baltimore) and Virginia as well? Maybe even West Virginia and Delaware? GeneralGoose 19:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Doubt it highly doubt it there gonna stay in the GTA world for now Like Vice City,San Andreas, Liberty City, and maybe Carcer City but in the future they should make and develope new cities counties ect.--Roman bellic 00:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

If so, GTA will quickly become dull and repetitive. The new SA and VC, if they come, would be fun and all, but in all honesty: if they just end up redoing LC, SA and VC, one of GTA's strong points, the cities, will soon turn into a series weakness. London and the DC region have so much potential, even though parts of the DC region in particular will need a bit of extra crime in their GTA rendition. GeneralGoose 04:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

They should just create more cities to be honest because those cities above have been with them for a while now and they should continue the stories games for entertainment because R* has been quiet with big games as of late with acceptions to TLAD and Chinatown wars but thats not a benifit to people who do not have a Ds. So improvements to the future-more cities more shot games--Roman bellic 23:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I think Gta 5 should be SanAndreas 2, you still get to bet Cj but there are new friends to be made ect , and you even get a mobile phone and stuff to use. they could even keep the camera and gym ect but in a different country. oor you could fly to a different country like your saying D.C, missions in SanAndreas and D.C

What do you think? --Gta&#39;s-Bitch 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm firmly against GTAs using past protagonists again (just cheap, lazy and wrong), and considering IV and the III era take place in presumably different canons, the III canon which had just been abandoned, revisiting the III era for V seems unlikely. And travelling between two large regions (D.C is too small for a whole city, but Virginia and Maryland additions would be great additions that wouldn't function as standalone games) would be extremely hard for the developers. GeneralGoose 14:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I think the next Gta should be like Gta iv in how realistic it is and when you get hit by a car and fall over ect and other things like lifting up cups and able to throw them. But it could be like Gta SanAndreas in many ways like you can kiss your girlfriend and it shows you the date like sitting in the Clukin' Bell. It shouldnt have things like going to the gym. But you can get tatooes* and get your hair styled ect. Also it could include the thing that you can add flames ect to the cars and stuff. ANy other suggestions? --Gta&#39;s-Bitch 00:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

R* doesn't want another city like Liberty because in every GTA theres a Mafia and i don't see it in capitol city

R* could do the cheap option or add it in, or do a surrounding city with the Mafia implemented. GeneralGoose 06:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Why not make it in a 3D version of Anywhere city, but actually located near one of the GTA states? Carlosvc92


 * --RFan93 21:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)RFan93 I personally think Rockstar will stick with the same cities over and over and over again.Maybe in a different order.I think the next GTA should be set in San Andreas with ALL the features in GTA:SAn Andreas and the new features that GTA:IV has.The new GTA should have new everything.

San Andreas--Carljonsonikobellic 15:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

I think that a DC area would be cool. But I think a New England fisherman setting would be cool to. PackieVercetti 2:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Conneticut. They should also include Bullworth on the setting because, just as Jimmy Hopkins says in Bully, "Bullworth Academy, the home to real scum. Arms dealers, drug runners and corporate lawyers. --PBello 19:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The only problem I can think of is that the Potomac is mentioned in GTA IV and it is implied that DC was set up there, thus that DC is actually a real city in the GTA universe. Mind you, that doesn't mean one based on it can't exist, in San Andreas there are numerous references to both New York City (K-Rose), California and LA on the radio (Bounce FM)...C-d-rom 16:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I love the idea.How about presidential assassination in the final mission (Throwdown)? HuangLee 01:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

HAHA, you know I came up with that idea. Peter13

I think, rather than a presidential assasination, there should be a plot in which you save the president, or assasinate a corrupt member of the opposing party. I think D.C would make a lovely setting for a new GTA, but it isn't really a city filled with criminals. Except for the politicians, of course. DarwinSighs 20:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'd say no although it would make a list of possible considerations maybe top 5, but I'd love 2 see Chicago or Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, you know some grittier and tougher than d.c. and all it's political mush. I see enough of that crap on the news. Or Carcer City's own James Earl Cash from Manhunt throwing down in a different place post Manhunt.--the MF'n Kriminal 07:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)