Talk:Attachments

Extended Clip
I've made a table to show the mag capacity increases with the extended clip attachment. I just want to know what do people think of it before I add it to the page. 20:33, July 1, 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't see a problem of adding it. In fact, it helps a lot and seems very detailed with the current values. One thing not very sure is the Assault Shotgun, or is because 200% means 8+8=16 (+100%) and then 16+16=32 (+100%). I'm a bit lost :P  Body Armor Android.png SWAT Cam F Torpedo Android.png Dispatch Detonator Android.png Data Files Crate Android.png 20:54, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Stupid me, it was 400% actually (since 32=4x8 and 8=100%, so 4x100%=400%). Thanks for spotting. 20:58, July 1, 2015 (UTC)


 * I did the calculations and it's actually 300%, while 400% is the total. BTW, the MG should be 85%, as 104% gave me a result of 110. The rest are fine. Sorry if I involved maths in this XD  Body Armor Android.png SWAT Cam F Torpedo Android.png Dispatch Detonator Android.png Data Files Crate Android.png 21:45, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * 104% is compared to the normal mag size, not the upgraded one. 54x1.04 = approx. 56. 21:48, July 1, 2015 (UTC)

When is an attachment not an attachment
We can't just use the "are they detachable" argument since 3D universe "attachments" weren't detachable (no capability in the game engine to add/remove silencers/scopes etc). But you could get a silenced pistol or a normal pistol - so they should be mentioned.

In the HD universe however, there is a distinct difference. If the weapon cannot come without the feature, it is an integrated feature, not an attachment.
 * Combat PDW = Only comes silenced. Not an attachment.
 * Heavy Pistol = Only comes with a red dot sight, cannot get one with iron sights.

These features should not be mentioned as attachments. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 19:34, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * So we automatically ditch these weapons just because their optic and suppressor aren't removable? Their capability is still worth mentioning, even if it doesn't come in the form of an optional attachment. 21:16, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
 * Frankly, yes, they don't belong on THIS article, which is about attachments. It is not about standard features - even if said features do replicate the functionality of attachments available on other weapons. Their integrated functionality is fully described on their respective pages, where it belongs. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 21:26, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
 * While the original argument still doesn't convince me, after reconsidering I agree that they don't necessarily need to be mentioned in this particular page, but only because it doesn't list the specific weapons that can be equipped with scopes or suppressors. We gotta still mention the Combat PDW on the Suppressor page, though. 22:00, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed, since the Suppressor page has no need to be limited to attachments, it can definitely include integrated ones. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 22:16, February 12, 2018 (UTC)