User talk:McJeff

Re Rollback
Actually Jeff, rollback is also valid where an editor has made multiple invalid edits to a page and a staff member is able to revert back to the correct last good version. Kamikatsu has diligently populated all the VCBI Crime tree information from the official Rockstar website and there is no reason for this to be removed, by a former main bureaucrat or anyone else. The agreed speculative bit was subsequently re-removed. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 03:56, April 24, 2019 (UTC)
 * And for the record... since you had made your talk page a redirect to your user page, one can only assume you did not want us talking to you? Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 03:58, April 24, 2019 (UTC)
 * Note, I've just had a better look and while I can understand Kam drawing the conclusion that the two characters on the website do refer to the ones in the introduction mission, I agree it is unsourced speculation (even if it is reasonably well-founded) so have re-removed the image and mission appearances sections as well. The structure of the articles does not need to be reverted back to the template-less version you were using. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 04:07, April 24, 2019 (UTC)
 * Noted. I hadn't looked at the history of the Leo Teal article but agreed 100% with your revision. I have just had a quick look (I am at work :) ) and there was a notation on the Eugene/Moweesha entry until Kam's recent edits where he has treated it as fact. I haven't looked back further to 2013 to see when it was added or when the fact template was applied to dispute it. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 04:21, April 24, 2019 (UTC)