Talk:Primo Custom

Merge
Shouldn't we make this just a part of the Primo page? All the other variants of vehicles have this, so why not here? Mortsnarg (talk) 15:33, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * Fine. Do what you want. Monkeypolice188-Signature-2.png &bull; Monkeypolice188-Signature-4.png &bull; Monkeypolice188-Signature-3.png 15:52, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll contact one of the admins to delete once it's moved over (honestly, I've never done a merge). Mortsnarg (talk) 16:30, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * Actually, I'll wait until the update is out. Maybe it's gonna be a wildly different vehicle, and we just can't see it. In any case, yeah, I think I'll wait. Mortsnarg (talk) 16:32, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * See the reason I haven't done the same with the Chino "Custom" and Faction "Custom" and Bucaneer "Custom" is because I haven't seen any evidence that they're actually named that, they could just be extra modifications on the originals, unlike this Primo Custom, which has been confirmed by Rockstar as they named it that in the Newswire. Monkeypolice188-Signature-2.png &bull; Monkeypolice188-Signature-4.png &bull; Monkeypolice188-Signature-3.png 17:27, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't merge tbh, since Bati and Bati Custom are differente vehicles on different pages. AndreEagle17    18:27, October 17, 2015 (UTC)

Why have a second page just because it says custom? Why does one word justify another page? Leo68 (talk) 18:30, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * Well... I said above, but maybe it's nothing different. Bati and Bati Custom are actually different. EagleIcon.png AndreEagle17  PS3 Triangle.png PS3 Cross.png PS3 Circle.png 18:42, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm just wondering, out of curiosity, what constitutes two vehicles that are VERY similar, or with the same name, having a different page? The two Buffalos have different pages for the two generations, while the Baller doesn't. I might be digging up an older argument here, and if so, I apoligize. I'm pretty sure it says on the vehicle Manual of Style here; that multi-generational vehicles in the same game, are on the same page; which should include the Primo. All this generational/variant crap needs to be layed out better, the one on the MOS page is pretty vague in my opinion, especially since a lot of the vehicle talk pages are dedicated to arguing over the generation/variants of vehicles. Mortsnarg (talk) 22:05, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * I think you just finally won me my case. If multiple generation vehicles have to be part of the same page according to the MOS, then everything has to be merged again. Leo68 (talk) 22:08, October 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * AHH! Thanks Leo, I actually agree with you, but it's so frustrating to have this discussion every couple of months, without fail. I think the Manual of Style, should really be given more attention, since, it's "This Wiki's backbone", and a lot of people just ignore something that's A. Super important, and B. Fairly short in comparision. That's just what I think though; I think it should be looked into more in discussions like this. Mortsnarg (talk) 22:14, October 17, 2015 (UTC)