Talk:Rumors

It has been proposed that this article be deleted
The Beta page and this page should not be merged or deleted, they have too many differences. The beta page were things that were actually suppose to be in the game but was changed or removed for what ever reason by Rockstar. While the pages about lies in GTA are about fictional features that were purely made up by the fans. User:Optimist33gta 15:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the title "lies" is a bit harsh. I think "Rumours" would be more accurate. I'll move the page. Gboyers talk 17:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Spelling?
Isn't spelt rumor, not rumour?

Page needs a new/better layout
Honestly, in my opinion, the page layout is a rather large eyesore. Instead of having the page layout be like this: Status
 * Example topic.

Why not have it like this: Green for True Red for False Blue for Debated Orange for Possible

Meaning that the layout would follow like this:

Game
...and of course have a message near the top telling what color represents what. Just an idea. Perhaps a table would go better for all this, idk I'll make my own version. Also, this would make the page less bulky. 20:04, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * True Rumour

I hate how the summary box is actually the section headline :| 20:05, November 25, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you. BTW, I can't tell if it's deja vu, but this page reminds me of the now-deleted Myths page

Ptr. Tony (talk) 23:45, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto V Rumour(s) Inclusion
I think the rumours for GTA V should be inserted here. The reason for this is ever since GTA V was announced, alot of well-thought-out and convincing rumours about the game were added on popular gaming sites, such as IGN, VG Cats, etc. Even I was convinced by these rumours. Any suggestions?

Ptr. Tony (talk) 23:52, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Albert DeSilva being the name for the GTA V protag, remember it?

I think it should be inserted in this page.

Mikey Klebbitz (talk) 15:42, November 27, 2012 (UTC)