User blog comment:Sasquatch101/Why San Fierro is better than Los Santos in real life./@comment-3301059-20140409230340/@comment-5715450-20140411001723

Los Santos should have been 3 times the size. Period. There was: no late night talk shows, no Disneyland, no Universal Studios, no Dodger stadium no pop culture (Ex: two and a half men house in malibu, or hells kitchen, ect.). R* excluded all the cool things that made LA cool. I was totally expecting a parody of The fast and the Furious or one of LA's all-time hit movies, To Live and die in LA. Who gives a shit about blain county?!? There is no wilderness that is truly isolated in the game. Come on! GTA V is a let down. The vehicles spawn is a joke compared to what GTA IV had. San Fierro is far more superior to Los Santos in every sense of the word. I don't consider R*'s idea of LA to be accurate. The whole game revolved around Vinewood and overall was to glamourous, and not gritty enough to be a good GTA game. All the protags sucked. The antagonist, which I'm not quite sure it was sucked. Finally, that fat, lazy turd Lester is the very essence why GTA V is the worst GTA game of it's era. If Bigfoot wasn't in the game I would have never gotten it.