User talk:EastonArquette

Errors/Bugs/Glitches/Oversights vs Intended (by design)
Factually claiming that obvious bugs and glitches are glitches unless they have been confirmed as such by the developer is not speculation.

In fact, the opposite is true. Since most developers (including Rockstar) will not own up to their errors or omissions except by way of patching, obvious errors should be treated as such unless confirmed to be intentional by Rockstar, not the other way around.

The disclaimer on Kate McReary's post-death phone call glitch which was added by you with supposed approval from Sam, Doc and Smashbro in chat in December 2015, was removed by an Administrator (at the time) in January 2020 with a perfectly valid explanation why the prior "approval" had been overruled.

Then commenced the edit war:
 * The note was reinstated by you with your invalid statements in the summary about what you think constitutes speculation.
 * Removed by a current Admin as "She was killed".
 * It was then reinstated by you with nonsensical, Myth-like speculation which even you previously admitted was inappropriate.
 * Re-removed with the warning to stop inserting Myth-like speculation on this wiki.

You then spouted off on the administrator's talk page (unsigned). Was the last edit summary message/warning condescending? Possibly, slightly. However, as stated above, it is our position when documenting the glitches that are prevalent in the games to treat them as such, not to speculate that they are potentially intentional "non-conventional twists".

Thanks. Smurfy: illuminate - communicate - spectate 21:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)