User blog comment:Sasquatch101/Why San Fierro is better than Los Santos in real life./@comment-5420135-20140411050537

Just because some unknown, nobody website says S.F. is better than L.A. dosen't make it true. I really like S.F. a lot, hell I even live there but there is absolutely zero crime what goes on there. The only crime what goes on in the Bay Area is in Oakland and the only crime what happens there is gang wars. Also, there is no media involvinf S.F. The only movies I recall taking place in S.F. was in the 70s. But after doing Los Santos in GTA V, I guess it would be a good idea for R* to do S.F. only because of the location.

And one more thing, how in the hell has this blog post become a GTA V bashing session? I get really disgusted with people who like shitting on GTA V and only enjoy complaining about stuff they don't like, instead of stating the things they did love in GTA V. GTA V is a phenomenal game  and one of the best I've ever played. I t has impeccable graphics, amazing map, and countless other things. I could come up with a trillion different things R* could have put in the game but I realize that this was a huge project for R* and they put in many things I never even thought of.

Smashbro, whenever I see you comment on a blog post you are always complaining about how bad GTA V is and how amazing these ten year old games are. You're either pushing your Saints Row garbage-clone on us or downtalking GTA V and IV's significance(and I did buy SR2 for the fun of it and it was one of the cheesiest, lamest games I've ever come accross. I didn't even complete the pathetic storyline). If you really despise GTA V and have absolutely zero good to say about it, then guess what? Don't comment. I've easily heard your opinion on GTA V a million times and now you're just forcing it on me. If you haven't heared already, there's a Saint's Row Wiki; I you'd like it a lot better than this one.